I’m in a soupy reading mood. There are too many ideas, too many threads, to try to be linear. So I throw it all in the pot haphazardly and it tends to come out all right. It works for me in reading. Not in cooking. Don’t ask me to cook dinner. It’s going to be a dump in the crock pot kind of deal.
What’s on the currently reading shelf right now?
- Dungeon Crawler Carl by Matt Dinniman. The social media is ocassionally right about things. My first litrpg. Good balance against the rest of this list.
- Faith Unraveled by the late, great Rachel Held Evans. A brush with brilliance. A spark of joy, a calm presence in a mad world.
- Vagina Obscura: An Anatomical Voyage by Rachel E. Gross. I’d like to generate a frequency table (without feeding it to a gluttonous AI) just to find out where the word “penis” rates in usage in a book about vaginas. That’s not a criticism. I think it’s a metaphor. Hats off to the people who study duck genitalia. Doing the Lord’s work there (I hope you’re still getting your grants right now).
- The Allure of the Archives by Arlette Farge. Thank you Introduction to Archives summer class. The back cover says this book is “a grand appreciation of the craft of discovery.” Yes please.
Sam Wineburg says that historical thinking is an unnatural act, a taught worldview. It’s a skill predicated upon an ability to dive deeply into the primary sources, hold them in dialogue with each other, and say “I don’t know” repeatedly until a sort of sense can be made. It’s about brushing up against the strange and unfamiliar past without “presentism:” To hold separate the self and our own lived experiences and the complexities of a past worldview.
Rachel Held Evans, author and blogger, writes, “I’m always afraid that if I remain silent or show signs of ambivalence, people will assume that I can’t think for myself, that I haven’t studied an issue or thought it through…I would rather people think I don’t bathe enough than think I don’t read enough.”
There’s the tension. How to make space for the not knowing when knowing is what the people want? Why praise certainty when the question is just waiting to be unpacked?
There’s an inherent humility to holding the space between knowing. The know/don’t know. The I don’t know what I don’t know. The scrap/push/pull/crawl to the next step before not knowing again.
There’s an inherent humility, awestruck and solemn, in glimpsing Grand Canyon sized gaps in knowledge and choosing to just keep digging down level by level into that gap.
If certainty is a feature and not a bug, of course no questions need to be asked. Of course, any little inconsistency or discrepancy or itchiness ought to be ignored if it threatens certainty.
Kafka possibly said something along the lines of, “a book must be the ax for the frozen sea within us.” Disruption. “You will not break me,” Carl mutters to himself in his powerlessness against a systemic machine. Resistance.
There’s the tension.
Also reading a bit of this: Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past by Sam Wineburg.